Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 56(8): 812-816, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35950908

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although rare, as the population ages, abdominal aortic aneurysm synchronous to abdominal malignancies, as renal cell carcinoma, is expected to become more prevalent. There are only two case reports of minimally invasive surgeries to treat these synchronous diseases, with endovascular aortic repair and laparoscopic nephrectomy, but they were performed in two stages, with iodinated contrast and without robotic assistance. CASE REPORT: We herein present a case of a 71-year-old patient with chronic kidney disease, a 6.4 cm infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm associated and a suspicious 6 cm solid-cystic expansile lesion in the right kidney, successfully treated at one stage with endovascular aortic repair using carbon dioxide as a contrast medium and with robotic right partial nephrectomy, aiming to preserve the renal function as much as possible. The patient's postoperative course was free of complications with hospital discharge on the fifth postoperative day, with a serum creatinine of 0.84 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: single-stage minimally invasive surgical treatment of AAA and RCC can be a safe and feasible approach. Combining a robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with an EVAR using carbon dioxide as a contrast medium was safe and successfully preserved renal function.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Neoplasias Renais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Dióxido de Carbono , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Creatinina , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
BJU Int ; 117(2): 266-71, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25327474

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with survival after palliative urinary diversion (UD) for patients with malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) and create a risk-stratification model for treatment decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected clinical and laboratory data for patients who underwent palliative UD by ureteric stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) between 1 January 2009 and 1 November 2011 in two tertiary care university hospitals, with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years and MUO confirmed by computed tomography, ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging. Factors related to poor prognosis were identified by Cox univariable and multivariable regression analyses, and a risk stratification model was created by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 1, 6 and 12 months, and log-rank tests. RESULTS: The median (range) survival was 144 (0-1084) days for the 208 patients included after UD (58 ureteric stenting, 150 PCN); 164 patients died, 44 (21.2%) during hospitalisation. Overall survival did not differ by UD type (P = 0.216). The number of events related to malignancy (≥4) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) index (≥2) were associated with short survival on multivariable analysis. These two risk factors were used to divide patients into three groups by survival type: favourable (no factors), intermediate (one factor) and unfavourable (two factors). The median survival at 1, 6, and 12 months was 94.4%, 57.3% and 44.9% in the favourable group; 78.0%, 36.3%, and 15.5% in the intermediate group; and 46.4%, 14.3%, and 7.1% in the unfavourable group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our stratification model may be useful to determine whether UD is indicated for patients with MUO.


Assuntos
Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Neoplasias Ureterais/mortalidade , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Derivação Urinária/métodos , Idoso , Brasil/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/mortalidade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Stents , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Ureterais/complicações , Neoplasias Ureterais/patologia , Obstrução Ureteral/etiologia , Obstrução Ureteral/mortalidade , Derivação Urinária/mortalidade
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 37(4): 461-467, July-Aug. 2011. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-600810

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE:To report the initial outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in a tertiary center in South America. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 11/2008 to 12/2009, a total of 16 transperitoneal robotic-assisted partial nephrectomies were performed in 15 patients to treat 18 kidney tumors. One patient with bilateral tumor had two procedures, while two patients with two synchronous unilateral tumors had a single operation to remove them. Eleven (73 percent) patients were male and the right kidney was affected in 7 (46 percent) patients. The median patient age and tumor size were 57 years old and 30 mm, respectively. Five (28 percent) tumors were hilar and/or centrally located. RESULTS: The median operative time, warm ischemia time and estimated blood loss was 140 min, 27 min and 120 mL, respectively. Blood transfusion was required in one patient with bilateral tumor, and one additional pyelolithotomy was performed due to a 15mm stone located in the renal pelvis. The histopathology analysis showed 15 (83 percent) malignant tumors, which 10 (67 percent) were clear cell carcinoma. The median hospital stay was 72 hrs and no major complication was observed. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is safe and represents a valuable option to perform minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.


Assuntos
Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/métodos , Robótica , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , América do Sul , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 34(2): 143-150, Mar.-Apr. 2008. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-484445

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perioperative and financial outcomes of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with holmium laser for upper tract calculi in 44 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2004 and September 2006, 44 patients treated for upper tract stone with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy were evaluated. Renal stones were associated with collecting system obstruction in 15 (34 percent) patients, failed extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) occurred in 14 (32 percent) patients, unilateral multiple stones in 18 (41 percent) patients, and multiple bilateral stones in 3 (7 percent). In 29 (66 percent) patients, the stone was located in the inferior calyx. Perioperative and financial outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: 50 procedures were performed in 44 patients. The mean stone burden on preoperative CT scan was 11.5 ± 5.8 mm. The mean operative time was 61.3 ± 29.4 min. The stone free rate was 93.1 percent after one procedure and 97.7 percent after a second procedure, with overall complication rate of 8 percent. Therapeutic success occurred in 92 percent and 93 percent of patients with lower pole stones and SWL failure, respectively. Treatment failure of a single session was associated with presence of a stone size larger than 15 mm (p = 0.007), but not associated with inferior calyx location (p = 0.09). Surgical disposables were responsible for 78 percent of overall costs. CONCLUSION: Flexible ureteroscopy using holmium laser is a safe and effective option for the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi. In addition, it can be considered an attractive option as salvage therapy after SWL failure or kidney calculi associated with ureteral stones. Stone size larger than 15 mm is associated with single session treatment failure.


Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Litotripsia a Laser/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Cálculos Ureterais/terapia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Litotripsia a Laser/economia , Assistência Perioperatória/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Cálculos Ureterais/economia , Ureteroscopia/economia
5.
Clinics ; 63(6): 731-734, 2008. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-497883

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report our initial experiences with laparoscopic partial cystectomy for urachal and bladder malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2002 and October 2004, laparoscopic partial cystectomy was performed in 6 cases at 3 institutions; 3 cases were urachal adenocarcinomas and the remaining 3 cases were bladder transitional cell carcinomas. All patients were male, with a median age of 55 years (45-72 years). Gross hematuria was the presenting symptom in all patients, and diagnosis was established with trans-urethral resection bladder tumor in 2 patients and by means of cystoscopic biopsy in the remaining 4 patients. Laparoscopic partial cystectomy was performed using the transperitoneal approach under cystoscopic guidance. In each case, the surgical specimen was removed intact entrapped in an impermeable bag. One patient with para-ureteral diverticulum transitional cell carcinoma required concomitant ureteral reimplantation. RESULTS: All six procedures were completed laparoscopically without open conversion. The median operating time was 110 minutes (90-220) with a median estimated blood loss of 70 mL (50-100). Frozen section evaluations of bladder margins were routinely obtained and were negative for cancer in all cases. The median hospital stay was 2.5 days (2-4) and the duration of catheterization was 7 days. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Final histopathology confirmed urachal adenocarcinoma in 3 cases and bladder transitional cell carcinoma in 3 cases. At a median follow-up of 28.5 months (range: 26 to 44 months), there was no evidence of recurrent disease as evidenced by radiologic or cystoscopic evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial cystectomy in carefully selected patients with urachal and bladder cancer is feasible and safe, offering a promising and minimally invasive alternative for these patients.


Assuntos
Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Cistectomia/métodos , Úraco/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 33(6): 803-809, Nov.-Dec. 2007. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-476644

RESUMO

Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is gaining acceptance and popularity among urologists all over the world. Early oncologic and functional results are encouraging. In this manuscript, we describe in detail both approaches for RARP and show the results of the robotic surgery program with over 300 RARP performed at our institution.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Laparoscopia/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Robótica/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/instrumentação , Robótica/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 33(1): 3-10, Jan.-Feb. 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-447460

RESUMO

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has emerged as a viable alternative for the conventional open nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). So far, an adequate renal parenchymal cutting and hemostasis, as well as caliceal repair remains technically challenging. Numerous investigators have developed techniques using different energy sources to simplify the technically demanding LPN. Herein we review these energy sources, discussing perceived advantages and disadvantages of each technique.


Assuntos
Humanos , Hemostasia Cirúrgica/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Nefrectomia/métodos
8.
Clinics ; 62(3): 251-256, June 2007. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-453284

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report the 5-year oncological outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer compared to a cohort of patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 88 patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma prior to January 2000. Of these, 45 patients underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and 43 patients underwent open radical nephrectomy. Inclusion criteria comprised clinically organ-confined tumors of 15 cm or less in size without concomitant lymphadenopathy or vena cava thrombus. Oncological follow-up data were obtained from charts, radiological reports, and phone calls to patients or their families, and were calculated from the date of surgery to the date of last appointment with physician or date of death. RESULTS: All laparoscopic procedures were completed without open conversion. On comparing the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and open radical nephrectomy groups, mean tumor size was 5. 8 vs 6.2 cm (P = . 44), mean blood loss was 183 vs 461 mL (P = . 004), and mean operative time was 2.8 vs 3.7 hrs (P < . 001). Over a mean follow-up of 5 years in the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group and 6 years in the open radical nephrectomy group, the overall survival was 81 percent vs 79 percent (P = . 47), and cancer-specific survival was 90 percent vs 92 percent (P = . 70) , respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer confers equivalent 5-year oncological outcomes to those of open surgery.


OBJETIVO: Relatar os resultados oncológicos após 5 anos de seguimento em pacientes submetidos a nefrectomia radical laparoscópica para tratamento do câncer renal, comparando esses com os resultados obtidos com um grupo de pacientes submetidos a nefrectomia radical aberta. MÉTODOS: Foram analisadas retrospectivamente as informações obtidas de 88 pacientes submetidos a nefrectomia radical para o tratamento do carcinoma renal realizadas previamente a Janeiro de 2000. Destes pacientes, 45 foram tratados com nefrectomia radical laparoscópica e 43 com nefrectomia radical aberta. Foram incluídos pacientes com tumores localizados com tamanho máximo de 15 cm, sem adenopatia ou sinal de envolvimento de veia renal na avaliação radiologica pré-operatória. As informações sobre o seguimento dos pacientes foram obtidas a partir de prontuários, laudos de exames radiológicos e ligações telefônicas para pacientes e/ou familiares. O seguimento foi calculado desde a data da cirurgia até a última consulta médica ou data de falecimento. RESULTADOS: Todos os procedimentos laparoscópicos foram realizados sem conversão para a técnica aberta. O tamanho médio tumoral foi de 5.8 e. 6.2 cm (P=0.44), perda sanguínea estimada de 183 e. 461 mL (P=0.004), e tempo operatório de 2.8 e. 3.7 horas (P<0.001) , respectivamente para os grupos nefrectomia radical laparoscópica e nefrectomia radical aberta. O tempo de seguimento médio foi de 5 anos para o grupo nefrectomia radical laparoscópica e 6 anos para o grupo nefrectomia radical aberta. A sobrevida global após 5 anos foi de 81 por cento e 79 por cento (P=0.47), e a sobrevida específica para cancer foi de 90 por cento e 92 por cento (P=0.70), para os grupos nefrectomia radical laparoscópica e nefrectomia radical aberta respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: A nefrectomia radical laparoscópica tem resultados oncológicos em 5 anos similares a técnica convencional aberta.


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Seguimentos , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 32(5): 504-512, Sept.-Oct. 2006. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-439381

RESUMO

The authors report the experience of a high-volume center with laparoscopic surgery in urological oncology, as well as a review of other relevant series. Laparoscopic outcomes in the treatment of adrenal, kidney, upper tract transitional cell carcinoma, bladder, prostate, and testicular malignancy are described in this review. Specific considerations as complications and port-site recurrence are also addressed. The authors concluded that the intermediate-term oncological data is encouraging and comparable to open surgery.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/cirurgia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Masculinos/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Análise de Sobrevida
10.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 31(2): 100-104, Mar.-Apr. 2005. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-411081

RESUMO

Open partial nephrectomy is the gold standard nephron-sparing treatment for small renal tumors. Technical aspects of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy have evolved considerably, and the technique is approaching established status at our institution. Over the past 4 years, the senior author has performed more than 400 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies at the Cleveland Clinic. Herein we present our current technique and review contemporary outcome data.


Assuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...